The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the responses of undergraduate and postgraduate students to a questionnaire about the range of books and the non-print material of a university library. It is manifest from the graph that more postgraduate students gave very good rating to the range of books, whereas more undergrads were very happy with the non-print material.
Just over half the postgrads opined that the range of books was very good, whereas almost a third said that it was satisfactory. By contrast 50% undergrads were just satisfied with the range of books and over a quarter said that the range of books was very good. Just under a quarter of undergrads and 12% postgrads were not happy with the range of books.
As far as the non-print material is concerned, just over a quarter postgrads and just over half undergrads rated it as very good. Almost half the postgrads were satisfied with the non- print material, whereas the percentage of satisfied undergrads was just a quarter. Approximately a fourth of undergrads and postgrads were not happy with the non-print material and rated it as very bad.
Overall, a majority of university students were satisfied or very happy with the range of books and the non-print material of the library.
- You recently heard about some new jobs at a local department store You would like to work there Write a letter to store manager of the department store In your letter Explain how you heard about the job Describe the kind of job you would like to have Give 89
- You have seen an advertisement for a parttime volunteer to work with out pay for an organisation that helps local children You would like to do this work Write a letter to the head of the organisation In your letter Say why you are interested in this type 73
- You want to go for a short holiday and invite a friend to join Write a letter to this friend in your letter Explain why you need a holiday Tell him him her about the place you want to visit Say why he she should come 73
- You have been renting an apartment in an English Speaking Country The landlord has been very helpful and friendly Now you are leaving and one of your friends would like to move into the apartment Write a letter to your landlord In your letter Explain when 84
- The table and chart give information on in 3 years Summarize information report main feature and compare relevant information 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.995215311 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79284063136 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.358851674641 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5840420942 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0464580637254 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323836614636 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755730733754 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427086628317 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594903080755 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.