Topic: Do you agree or disagree with following statement?
"People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years"
In the proceeding decades, the world has experienced unprecedented changes and the lifestyle of people has been revolutionized and they have less time in comparison with not too far ago. Therefore, the question which comes to mind is that, to what extent, these changes can alter people's personal lives and whether they would spend less time cooking? I resolutely possess the conviction that people will lead hectic lives; therefore, they would not be able to allocate enough time to cooking and preparing food.
The first reason coming to mind is concerned with the issue that people need to learn many skills to be adopted to this fast-changing world. Consequently, they need to allocate most of their time learning new skills to allow them to live in this competitive world. To put it differently, in this increasingly changing world we need to update our knowledge and skills by invariable learning. According to recent studies done by a group of researchers at the University of Harvard, people spend three times of what they have devoted to learning ten years ago t. For this reason, one can easily conclude that this result can be generalized to twenty years later.
The last but not least reason by which my claim is justified is that due to the advancements of technology new methods will be thrived that take a little time to cook. In other words, recent technologies have paved the way for doing daily stuff in much more convenient and faster ways. For instance, in twenty years, robots would be able to cook and one can have his food ready without making any effort. Therefore, people would be able to spend more time on a task other than their daily stuff. Had I a robot to cook food, I would not cook by myself and take advantage of my time learning a new skill to earn more money.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely reach the conclusion that people would not be able to spend much time on cooking and preparing food, due to the fact that not only do they need more time to cultivate their skills, but also there would be facilitating devices and robots which make it easier and faster to cook and other stuff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-27 | porteghale Abiasli | 70 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-17 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | yasamiamirreza | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | yasamiamirreza | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinion of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are they are to older people 70
- Is it as important for older people to learn and new things as it is for young people 87
- Topic Do you agree or disagree with following statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 73
- TPO 43 Integrated Task 90
- TPO 46 Integrated Writing 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
...d to twenty years later. The last but not least reason by which my claim is justified i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: I_A[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am' (first person of "to be")?
Suggestion: am
...ask other than their daily stuff. Had I a robot to cook food, I would not cook by...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69230769231 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5174272445 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501326259947 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6291258787 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.357142857 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9285714286 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256214751258 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959885801877 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544637204743 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1715942364 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501067765242 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.