Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt states that any piece of information people referred to as fact should be doubted, as they are always inaccurate. Some people would argue that information would always relevant. However, in my opinion, I mostly agree that information that is believed to be accurate is often proven otherwise for three reasons.
Firstly, most facts in the history of science have been proven false in recent times. For example, prior to the discovery of the causative agent of cholera (a water borne infection), it was believed that some unknown forces were responsible for the outbreak of the disease, and this was assumed to be fact then. However, with the development of science, it is now known that this infection is caused by a bacteria found in contaminated water source. Research, as also shown that most of the scientific speculations made in earlier times have been proven to be false. This shows that indeed some information is in fact incorrect and should be doubted.
Likewise, in the field of astronomy, the most speculations have been confirmed as false. For example, in the early era of astronomy, it was assumed that only the planet earth has the necessary and adequate composition to support life. However, this has been found to be inaccurate, as such compositions are also present on planet mars through the development of advance technological equipment and procedures. Another example is the specious fact that celestial bodies such as the stars are relatively small compared to the earth; however, research has also proven that these bodies are much larger than the earth in size.
On the other hand, some piece of information has remained accurate. For example, the simple rules of addition and subtraction in mathematics have not been proven false till date. Likewise, basic biological theory such as the fact that we breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide has not been found to be inaccurate.
In conclusion, though it is true that some information that are referred to as accurate have indeed been found to be false, however, this is not true for all information as there are evidence of information that are still very much in use and are accurate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 68
- It is grave mistake to theorize before one has data 66
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus 50
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years a recent survey of video game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed The survey asked v 73
- It is a grave mistake to theorize before one has data 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bacterium' or simply 'bacteria'?
Suggestion: a bacterium; bacteria
... known that this infection is caused by a bacteria found in contaminated water source. Res...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00550964187 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72010355269 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468319559229 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9373222409 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5625 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270422101126 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991159813063 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808451452788 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173514147745 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739690667452 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.