Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In recent years, learning a foreign has received exponential attention from people courtesy of the benefits it brings. Therefore, people are having an oscillating opinion about whether their children should start learning a new language at a young age or later on at secondary school. In this case, many experts tend to gravitate towards the former for a number of reasons. In this essay, the benefits and drawbacks of this notion will be further elucidated.
To begin with, exposure to a new language other than one’s mother tongue earlier in life can help them to accumulate a sense of curiosity for the country of the targeted language. One prominent justification for this is that children are naive and constantly learning individuals, therefore, when they embark on the journey of learning a second language, they may nurture within themselves an enthusiasm for the tradition or history of that country, which can help to build up a reservoir of knowledge for youngsters. Another worth-mentioning reason is that learning languages can have a positive impact on one’s brain. By learning at such a young age, youngsters are used to taking in a large amount of information about grammar or vocabulary. By virtue of this, it is possible that bilingual children may receive better communication and analytical skill.
On the other hand, striving to become bilingual at a younger age can be exhausting. For example, in many countries, parents force their children to take many extra classes in order for them to fully achieve the language. As a result, children are snowed under several homework and exercises, which can be detrimental to their mental health. They might also develop a sense of disliking the language if they are not cut out for learning languages in general.
To recapitulate, many families have their kids being bilingual at such a young age as primary students and this can both be beneficial and disadvantageous. However, I firmly believe that the positive facet of this notion outweighs the drawbacks it brings with being influential and advantageous to one’s brain.
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
- The plans show Ashford in 2010 and Ashford now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 84
- The diagram shows the process of growing bananas for selling in supermarkets 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
In recent years, learning a foreign has received exponential attention from...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun homework seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some homework'.
Suggestion: some homework
... As a result, children are snowed under several homework and exercises, which can be detrimental...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... are not cut out for learning languages in general. To recapitulate, many famil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in general, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17008797654 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93716938436 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551319648094 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3190038232 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293260148611 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872892828158 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421718425905 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166846483406 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495602342272 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.