Studies suggested that nowadays children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on active or creative things. What are the reasons? And what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
It is a modern children being preferable watch television and less taking part in activities are the primary culprits behind this tendency. In this essay will demonstrate some measures can be taken to mitigate these potential consequences.
On the one hand, there are various compelling interpretations why a plethora of youngsters have a tendency to watch television rather than engage in creative activities. The most obvious reason for this tendency is that the television's quality and programs’ contents are a predominant factor drawing a myriad of children’ attraction. Prime example, in the old days, teenagers were able to watch programs with white-black colors through small TV frames, besides sound systems were more susceptible to crack and unclearly hearing due to unstable connection. In contrast, in this day and age, thanks to technology development, Televisions are big telly and have vivid resolution and sound quality with a variety of colors contributing to stimulating children’s visuals. What is imperative is that these days, there are a flurry of fascinating programs like animated movies which is one of ubiquitous films causing to be infatuated with television. Another compelling point is that the bulk of parents having hectic schedules have a proclivity to be indifferent to their offspring. As a result, these children do not take proper care as well as meticulous guidance, thus they are able to consider watching television similar to recreational activities.
Several feasible solutions can be implemented to remedy the aforementioned problems. One measure to this problem is for the parents to be in charge of nurturing and playing with their broods. It is no wonder that both fathers and mothers should raise their children’s awareness and help them understand more about the detrimentals of watching TV too much. It is clear that restricting this watching acts as a deterrent to a flurry of diseases related to eyes. Another viable solution could be that the parents should spend more time playing games pertaining to cerebral such as puzzle or sudoku together, this is not only family bond, but this acts as a precursor to facilitate their child’s enhancement down the road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-21 | kimtaeyeons | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | nganle0912 | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-18 | yaldaasgari | 89 | view |
| 2017-11-08 | erhj_2008 | 86 | view |
- the only way to improve the safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offenses What extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be the effects on society 82
- In some countries more and more adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 819, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'flurries'?
Suggestion: flurries
...erative is that these days, there are a flurry of fascinating programs like animated m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...implemented to remedy the aforementioned problems. One measure to this problem is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, thus, well, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33618233618 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05050652385 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.002550954 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.785714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249630741826 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742516826264 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465061128619 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160367810705 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135588217666 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.