Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992
The line graph demonstrates the proportions of British people over four years old who watched television and who listened to the radio over the course of twenty-four hours in 1992.
Overall, all the figures experienced dramatically fructuated changes through several timelines of the day. In particular, the percentage of television viewers registered a sharp increase while the number of radio audience representative s kept falling drastically, especially in the evening.
At about a quarter past six, the percentage of people watching television was about 3%, while the figure for radio users was twice higher that amount and, after 2 hours, it rose to respectively 27%, with it also being the peak of the number of radio listeners. However, after that time, a substantial number of people instantly stopped listening to the radio. Thus, a significant drop in the proportion of radio audiences was obvious. In contrast, from the 10 a.m onwards, the figure for television audiences experienced a slow but steady growth. As a result, by 8 p.m, the number of UK citizens over the age of four watching television had reached a peak of nearly 45%, while the number of people still sticking to the radio stood at merely around one-fifth of that amount.
After 8 p.m, the proportions of both television and radio audiences experienced a downward trend. In other words, people gradually stopped using entertainment devices, including TV sets and radio receivers; therefore, the number of users considerably decreased to approximately 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | kostina_m1986 | view | |
| 2021-08-09 | kostina_m1986 | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | kostina_m1986 | 84 | view |
- Radio and Television Audiences in UK October December 1992 60
- The chart below shows estimated world literacy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adulta decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 92
- Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amount of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought by wealthy parents 67
- The number of men and women in further education in Britain 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in contrast, in particular, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29387755102 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0245972054 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567346938776 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8999165275 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.7 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271114149723 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114199924371 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629454741076 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15656336592 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346448861111 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.