The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030.
The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of the population aged 65 and over in three different countries (Canada, Germany, and the UK) over the course of 20 years starting from 1980 and prediction in 2030.
As it is observed, while all three nations saw an upward tendency over the period shown, Germany maintained its position as the country with the highest proportion of elderly people. Furthermore, the projected figure for 2030 shows that Canada will witness the biggest growth when compared to the other two countries.
In 1980, exactly 15% of Germany's population was people aged 65 and over. This figure had increased precisely to 20% by the year 2000. Meanwhile, the UK and Canada commenced with approximately 14% and 10% respectively in 1980, with both countries reaching 15% of the elderly population 20 years later.
Projections for 2030 elucidate that there will be a 5% rise in the percentage of inhabitants aged 65 or over in Germany, reaching exactly one quarter. Canada is predicted to show a further increase of roughly 7% by 2030, making just over one-fifth of their population elderly people. A similar pattern can be applied to the UK, although the figure will only climb to approximately 19% by the year 2030.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 83
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00966183575 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76932551496 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6519305773 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40668020311 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157666619645 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123577209731 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251249793959 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116719606799 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.