The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the percentage of women in senior management positions in three companies from 1975 to 2015.
While more women were in senior positions at Finsbury Ltd than the other two companies in 1975 at 16%, the trend was fairly erratic with a 2% drop to 14% in 1980, followed by a rise of 1% five years later. In 1990, women held 7% more top management jobs than in 1985. After a slight drop back to 20% in 2000, by 2015 26% of top posts were filled by women.
By contrast, at Eldan Ltd women fared much better. In 1975, 3% of senior posts were occupied by women with no change five years on. By 1985, the figure had increased to 14%, doubling to 28% in 1990. Ten years afterwards, there was a 5% increase in female senior management jobs with a near twofold jump in 2015 to stand at 64%, the highest for the three companies.
The situation was less remarkable at Bamforth Ltd than the other two firms except for the year 2015. In 1975, the percentage of senior posts held by women was 9% climbing at the rate of 2% in each subsequent period until 2000, after which it leapt to 46%.
From the data, it is clear that women dominated senior posts at Eldan by 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | rajpatel90 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | AKHYAR ALI | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Dave Skylark | 84 | view |
- Many students find it difficult to focus or pay attention at school nowadays What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 65
- Some people believe that young people are giving more importance to books and movies to learn about the lesson of life than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think children should have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Some believe children should be taught to give speeches and presentations in school Why is this Should this be taught in schools 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34389140271 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20007240444 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8992237684 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2727272727 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218669551777 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105187503161 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113772382649 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178169599258 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135347311205 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.