In this increasingly competitive society, formal academic degrees are considered to be more crucial than hands-on experience by some job recruiters when they seek new candidates. This trend happens due to several causes, and I believe it is a negative tendency.
To begin with, there are some reasons why a host of employers prefer formal qualifications to practical skills. Firstly, since universities usually provide an interactive learning environment for not only acquiring basic knowledge but also cultivating soft skills, getting these degrees can open the door to better job opportunities. For example, interpersonal and teamwork skills can be improved by doing group projects, which makes a contribution to all-round development. Secondly, there is a great need for many professional jobs to be studied for the long term in research environment. For instance, the accumulation of specialized knowledge, as well as the conduct of an array of experiments, is vitally important for those who chase a career as doctors. In case of lack of the higher education pursuit, there might be less likelihood to be qualified for such kinds of jobs.
However, I would argue this is a negative development because of some drawbacks. First, having a university degree no longer plays an important role in seeking career prospects even in this knowledge-based society. This is because vocational training with a much shorter period of time currently gains more popularity as a result of employment opportunities it opens up, coupled with job security upon completion. Additionally, the commonplace of the pursuit of tertiary education and formal qualifications would lead graduates to apply for jobs that are deserving. This increases the lack of blue-collar workers, contributing directly to imbalances in the workforce that would damage the economic structure of a country.
In conclusion, there are a myriad of reasons causing the valuation of formal qualification over practical experience in search of employment, and I believe this tendency brings greater disadvantages.
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 78
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should they be punished 78
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...vocational training with a much shorter period of time currently gains more popularity as a re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 552, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...d lead graduates to apply for jobs that are deserving. This increases the lack of blue-collar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...country. In conclusion, there are a myriad of reasons causing the valuation of for...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53773584906 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28015158291 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632075471698 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.718015978 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.785714286 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0477496290349 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0188586214844 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256821126596 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0316820959848 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293249665654 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.