The maps give information about a university sports court.
The maps depict modifications to a sports court of an unspecified university from 1990 to the present day. Overall, the sports court underwent a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replaced or added.
Between 1990 and the present day, the outdoor pool was converted into an indoor pool while no changes happened to the services next to it which are the cafe and the reception. The changing room was greatly expanded and then moved next to the fitness centre, where there once was a place for tennis players.
Another major change to the area was the rearrangement of the tennis courts. They were relocated from the southeast to the southwest of the university's sports area, replacing a big car park that used to be there. Furthermore, the number of tennis courts was doubled-expanded from the original two to four. The park with trees and grassland was demolished to construct a basketball court.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | lalo | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Feresew | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The table below shows information regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 100
- Some people feel that young people should follow the traditions of their society Others however believe that young people should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 58
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000 to 2011 39
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06535947712 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90341775826 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7123753559 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166403711728 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800367516202 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895009707973 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130122508525 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113336515758 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.