The maps give information about a university sports court in 1990 and now
The two pictures compare the layouts of a university sports court in two periods, namely 1990 and the present time. It is clear that there are changes in the layout of this sports court over the period shown. The main modifications have included the removal of a park as well as a car park, and the addition of many new facilities.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1990 there was a park in the northwest corner of the map. Now, however, the park has been removed to make way for a basketball court. In addition, the car park in the southwest has been demolished, creating space to build four tennis courts.
The two maps also show that the fitness center in the bottom right corner has been constructed, where two tennis courts were laid in 1990. Furthermore, the cafe and the reception in the middle have remained the same; however, the changing room below the reception has been moved to the north side of the fitness center. Finally, the outdoor pool in the right side of the cafe and the reception has been turned into an indoor pool
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-17 | lalo | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | thanh1927540 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-17 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-14 | Feresew | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-05 | thuphuong2302 | view |
- The map illustrates the different layouts of a school in 1985 and now 73
- The diagram shows how olive oil is made 56
- The maps give information about a university sports court in 1990 and now 78
- The process below shows the process of producing smoked fish
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50515463918 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3423170461 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551546391753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8806982218 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182785261048 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761188934574 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739589309562 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121169801011 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476033274343 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.