Reading explain the advantage of hydrogen based fuel cell engine over internal combustion engine and provides three points to support the theory. The lecture disputes the points made in reading.
First, reading claims that internal combustion are limited and may be run out in upcoming years but hydrogen can be found easily from many sources and renewable. In contrast, orator contends that the form of hydrogen- liquid form, are not available directly from nature, which is almost artificial form at extremily cold temperature so difficult to produce.
Second, article asserts that this new form of energy is solve the problem of pollution because it is made by using hydrogen and water on the other hand, combustion energy released lot of carbon dioxide which is harmful for environment. Inversely, lecture states that actually to manufacture pure form of hydrogen, there is lot of coal and oil burning which cause the pollution.
Finally, reading contends that hydrogen energy consumption is half as compare to internal combustion engine to cover same distance,which means hydrogen fuel is less expensive than internal combustion engine. On the other hand, lecture suggests that for the manufacture of hydrogen energy we need platinum metal, which is hardly available and expensive so it is almost more expensive than combustion engine.
In conclusion, according to lecture to manufacture hydrogen based fuel energy is expensive and not pollution free and not easy process.
- When choosing a place to live what do you consider most important location size style number of rooms types of rooms or other features Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 70
- Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America s west coast from California to Alaska A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns because o 80
- TPO 11 Independent Writing Task Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- Tpo 9 Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past I completely disagree with this claim that nowadays children are less creative than they were in the past Here you can see my reasons 70
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
Reading explain the advantage of hydrogen based fuel ce...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Reading) must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
Reading explain the advantage of hydrogen based fuel ce...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...asserts that this new form of energy is solve the problem of pollution because it is ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, reading contends that hydrogen energy consumption is half as compare to intern...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33035714286 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63135467459 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5500744353 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272906571073 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112391164612 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639731037533 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15144286193 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409509143374 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.