Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Acceptance of a poor condition, for instance, an unsuitable career or financial difficulties, is claimed to be the first and foremost option by some people. However, others suggest that it is more effective when people try their best to upgrade such negative situations. There are many explanations why people support the first statement, in contrast, I think that the best for those is to try and develop their conditions.
Some people think that living comfortably with a bad situation is the most optimal choice. There are numerous reasons why they pursue their judgements. A deprived childhood can provide children with vital moral qualities. When not having adversity-free time, children have to encounter underestimation or bullying alongside financial obstacles which somehow assist them to improve the sense of flexibility and loyalty. Moreover, the worse our situations are, the more we respect our properties. This case is the lifetime lesson that is necessary for the majority of the population as what they are experiencing currently, from culture diversity to peace, in spite of their conditions, are the achievements that their ancestors have tried for millennia to gain.
On the other hand, making efforts and improving the negative situations are suggested to be the most optimal option. When improving a severe situation, there is a likelihood for humanity to develop their skills, especially those which are linked with survival. By doing that, people can encourage others who witness the similar aspects to join the phenomenon as they are setting a good example for people across social standards to learn from. In addition, trying and developing situations such as a dead-end job or shortage of money significantly reduce the pressure of criminals on national authorities since this problem depends on citizens moral standards. When seeking for solutions to upgrade the situations legally, people will not be controlled by the power of money and impacts of some negative parts of the society as the priority is not only living standards but also social influence instead of money.
To put things in a nutshell, although many people believe that adapting to current conditions in spite of their difficulties is the best, i wholeheartedly believe that making efforts to improve such situations can benefit individuals and the whole society in general.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- Some children do not have the natural ability to learn languages Some school should not force children to learn foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In most countries animal and plant species are declining rapidly What are the causes of this What measures could be done to prevent this decline 11
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 1629221490316151501759 jpg 73
- OKeokekeke 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
..., I think that the best for those is to try and develop their conditions. Some people ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, i think, in addition, in contrast, in general, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35561497326 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91985098163 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550802139037 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6150615147 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.533333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254771178525 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816200380857 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636960278084 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159161369301 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452582920168 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.