The table below gives information about problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The table showed key on the issues that students encountered in two schools in different years, 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of the educational problems in school A was recorded more than school B over the given period. In addition, two distinct schools had an upward trend about the figure of problems.
As can be seen from the table, there was only handwriting which stayed stably at 28 percent. Moreover, students with problem of reading ability increased slightly from 22% to 23%. Meanwhile, other problems almost witnessed a dramatic decrease in which concentration in lessons and following instructions fell by 18%, approximately a half of a first year.
According to the table, in school B the figures of different educational problems increased gradually from 2005 to 2015. At the same school A about handwriting problem, School B also had no change, just about 7%. It is noticeable that spelling and following instructions increased doubly from 5% to 10% and from 6% to 12%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people traveling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries 68
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The table below gives information about problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 84
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people traveling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19393939394 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96489407532 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624242424242 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6948924694 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260451510819 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111437836038 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900283134472 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172756405539 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792677514813 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.