The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the graph reveals that the similarities of fertility rates in China and the USA during the period from 1920 to 2000. It is clear that the birth rates of both nations followed the same trend.
Rising from just above 10 percent in 1920 to 15 percent in1935, China's birth rate after fell to 5 percent between 1940 and 1945. The birth rate peaked at 20 percent in 1950, before taking a nosedive to around 9 percent in 1955. It is obvious that China saw a noticeable downfall prior to 1985 then there was a slight climb in the birth rate to just above 3 percent until 1995. The last 5 years, however, dropped to 2 percent in this figure.
It can be plainly viewed that the USA's fertility rate touched the lowest point of less than 5 percent in 1945, after rising and falling erratically. After that, we can see an upward trend to 15 percent in 1950. Subsequently, the birth rate changed intermittently to a low of just 10 percent in 1970. The following 20 years saw a downward tendency in its rate, to somewhere between 9 and 7 percent, followed by a ceaseless decline. After 1990, the rate plunged marginally, before falling to about 7 percent just the same as the percent in 1985.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do it could not function 67
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed at 20 percent in 1950, before taking a nosedive to around 9 percent in 1955. It is obvi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45205479452 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44716483922 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538812785388 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8191203933 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160777917296 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754613597222 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590220152052 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141664791066 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057402774347 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.