The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line chart illustrates the unemployment rates in Australia in four quarters of 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the figures in both areas experienced significant changes throughout the year. In addition, the percentage of unemployment in urban areas saw an upward trend, as opposed to that in rural areas, which revealed an opposite trend.
It can be seen from the chart that, at the beginning of the period, the proportion of unemployed people in rural regions and urban areas stood at nearly 7% and 2%, respectively. The rate in rural areas declined considerably to above 4% at the end of the first quarter, and this was followed by a marginal fluctuation around a downward trend. By contrast, the proportion of people without job in cities indicated a dramatic growth to nearly 4%, after which it witnessed a remarkable fluctuation around an upward trend. It is noticeable that two figures ended up at approximately 5%
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report f 78
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Topic The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two figures ended up at approximately 5%
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97399975727 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7797920101 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080751463248 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439344314167 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608671685615 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851227446134 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706130598393 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.