The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line graph represents the comparison between the yielding out of oil and its usage throughout the China from years 1982 to 2006, in million of oil barrels per day.
A glance at this data can figure out some striking points, such as oil has been used extravagantly by the country with respect to its development in production capacity. Thus, outracing the production capacity.
It can be seen that the oil production capacity of China upsurged in 1986 to 3 million oil barrels per day from 2.1 million barrels in 1982. This rate of increment in its production could have fulfilled the demand, but, this rate of increase in its yielding out oil per day stayed stable, almost for next 8 years. This figure grew steadily over the given time and submitted at about 3.5 million barrels of oil per day in 2006.
In contrast to this, the usage of oil barrels per day was constant from 1982 to 1990, just below 2 million barrels of oil. But for the next four years, the consumption rate climbed up noticeably to 3.5 million barrels, multiplied by almost 1.75 times, thus outracing the production capacity. Afterward, the usage rate did not come down but infact increased further, reaching as high as 6.4 million barrels per day at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period Summarise 73
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...t the China from years 1982 to 2006, in million of oil barrels per day. A glance at ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, thus, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73755656109 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51675656235 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542986425339 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0368699021 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165655257636 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837947196307 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702220283765 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128029440499 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755181477714 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.