The line graph gives information about the number of Iranian, Greek and Turkish students who enrolled at Sheffield University between 2005 and 2009.
The line graph provides information about the total number of students from Iran, Greece, and Turkey who got admission to Sheffield university during 2005 and 2009. The data is in the total number of students per year.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given line chart that participants from turkey and Iran both showed an upward trend. And Greece started a downward trend in this category.
To comments with, in 2005, students from Greece was at the top position in this list with nearly 180 students, which was around 160 and 150 students more than Turkey and Iran respectively. Furthermore, the number of Turkey and Iran students increased by over 60 students, whereas the ratio of Greece decreased drastically to 65 students in the following two years.
Moreover, the trend of Turkish students rose in 2008 and 2009, which reached a peak of 120 students. In addition, students from Greece continue to decrease over 2 years, which accounted for 42 students in 2009. However, the Iranian trend has experienced increments in the following years, which was at the first place among others in 2009 with nearly 159 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-04 | Le Trang | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | view | |
| 2021-12-29 | thienan8443626 | view | |
| 2021-12-19 | thienan8443626 | view | |
| 2021-08-23 | rajpatel90 | 84 | view |
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
- Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies factories and their employees to the countryside Do you agree or disagree 78
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 56
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cites in the same week in May 2007 73
- The graph shows the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia between 1980 and 2010 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01587301587 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55787137505 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582010582011 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1757941698 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265651322692 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114569020596 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111016670433 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167678588832 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132110731473 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.