Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Nowadays, a lot of administrations all over the globe are looking for a solution for traffic congestion and its attendant problems such as air pollution. Some believe that increasing the price of petrol is a practical remedy. However, many take issues with this view and think better solutions should be applied. I personally accord with the latter statement.
Some people think that putting up the price of fuel could decline the volume of traffic dramatically. Because these days a lot of people prefer not to use public transport in favor of their personal automobiles, and since the price of petrol is reasonable, the folks do not hesitate to use their own vehicles. Furthermore, increasing the price of fuel could change people's minds. Besides that, these days, in some countries, especially undeveloped ones, driving in the streets has turned into a recreation for youngsters. Hence, going up the price of petrol could omit this cause.
From my notion, increasing the price of fuel could have some deleterious impacts on the stability of all prices in a nation. To be more specific, in a country, the prices of all products are dependent on each other, and the price of petrol cannot be risen autonomously. Consequently, acting upon this policy could provoke fierce criticism on account of the inconvenient outcome.
Further emphasizing on my view, manifold decisions could be made to overcome this problem. first and foremost, uplifting the welfare of passengers in public transport could encourage people not to use their own vehicles in favor of public ones. Apart from that, providing people with public transport free of charge could motivate the folks to use public vehicles. By putting these remedies into action the volume of traffic congestion would slump.
To recapitulate, putting up the price of petrol could induce some instabilities in societies. Instead, better plans could be implemented to overcome the problems such as traffic jam and air pollution.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 10
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 70
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 35
- The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 80
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
Comments
Thank you. What does it (No.
Thank you. What does it (No. of Different Words) mean exactly? Does it mean that I used repetitive words a lot?
'No. of Different Words'
'No. of Different Words' means how many different words you used in the essay.
If No. of Words are big while No. of Different Words are small, then the e-rater will give warnings. yes, it means that you used repetitive words a lot.
You got better.
flaws:
No. of Words: 319 while No. of Different Words: 163
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 319 350
No. of Characters: 1614 1500
No. of Different Words: 163 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.226 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.06 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.714 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 60 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.765 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.64 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.362 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.073 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5