Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

There is a general belief that organizing a global sporting competition is benificial for a nation. Nonetheless, this notion has been opposed by other people who are of the belief that hosting such events pose a negative influence. The objective of this essay is to account for these two contradictory viewpoints before indicating my position.

On the one hand, there are different rationales for why holding a world-class sports tournaments such as Olympics or FIFA World Cups would bring far-reaching benefits. In the first place, the organization of these big events can build reputation and dignity of the host country all over the world. Admittedly, raising the national profile could lead to lasting economic benefits, especially income from Tourism. In particular, through the imagery displayed in the media, the host would create strong impression on international spectators and become a popular destination. Last but not least, the host country's athletes would be roused to compete for sake of patriotism and national glory. As a result, this would greatly invigorate the nation's sporting movement.

On the other hand, being a sponsor of global sporting competitions could be detrimental for several reasons. For one thing, the host country would spend gigantic national budget constructing new sporting facilities as well as upgrading existing ones. This not only takes a toll on the public budget but also opens up opportunities for corruption from dubious dealings. Secondly, the daily lives of local people can be disrupted due to making event preparations. Some countries, for instance, recruiting a huge influx of peple from overseas to build sporting facilities can cause conflict with the locals.

In conclusion, although there are plausible explanations both for and against the notion above, i would argue that the benefits of hosting international sporting events overshadow its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-22 hoaithuongnguyen283 89 view
2022-04-08 quytnee 56 view
2022-04-08 quytnee 56 view
2022-04-08 quytnee 56 view
2022-04-08 quytnee 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lian Universities in span of seven years from 2001 to 2007 and later remain stabl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 937.175257732 115% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47715736041 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91287418054 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 290.88556701 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2892807143 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 76.5299724578 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 4.34317383033 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17812614968 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811598960556 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495231862401 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120879528119 0.12726935374 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323235823801 0.0580467560999 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 8.71597938144 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lian Universities in span of seven years from 2001 to 2007 and later remain stabl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 937.175257732 115% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47715736041 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91287418054 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 127.690721649 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 290.88556701 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.2892807143 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 76.5299724578 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 4.34317383033 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17812614968 0.216113520407 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811598960556 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495231862401 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120879528119 0.12726935374 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323235823801 0.0580467560999 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 8.71597938144 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 8.15463917526 184% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.