The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrates changes in the average proportions of household expenditures in a country between 1950 and 2010.
Overall, it is noticeable that the spending patterns for housing and food shifted considerably while the healthcare section remained the lowest after 60 years.
In the mid-1900s, the average family expenditure on housing took up the highest percentage, at 72.1%, whereas that on healthcare was the lowest, at merely 2.4%. Families allocated 3.3% of their expense on transportation, which was roughly half the figure for education. Meanwhile, food and other expenses accounted for 11.2% and 4.4%, respectively.
In 2010, this country witnessed some major shifts in spending habits. Food became the category that families spend the most money on, contributing 34% to the household expenditure, slightly triple what was seen in 1950. By contrast, the proportion of family spending on housing experienced a significant decrease of about 50% to 22%. Finally, there was also a negligible decline of 0.3% to 6.3% in the educational category, compared to dramatic increases to 19.2% and 14% in the figures for other expenses and transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | lennie.butera | view | |
| 2021-08-25 | Amelie | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | prathamp114 | 56 | view |
- Topic many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The number of passengers using three rail networks from 1950 to 2010
- Topic Some people say that art such as painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas believing that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49723756906 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06863183321 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0058475033 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123812134976 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586247517343 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102591551984 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107496149936 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133657264521 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49723756906 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06863183321 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651933701657 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0058475033 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123812134976 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586247517343 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102591551984 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107496149936 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133657264521 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.