The mass media including TV, Radio and newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of television and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of watching too much television is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that television's role in today's world can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a psychological standpoint, spending so much time in front of the television can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that news channels, as well as entertainment, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered television acting as a companion for the elderly. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being the favourite pastime and having a negative impact on children apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, being a medium to access information might increase the consequences of global news. Moreover, fundamental aspects of television's cultural impact relate to this reality that the demerits of consuming content pertain to becoming an essential part of our lives. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of wasting time on television is correlated negatively with teenagers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of limiting a child's exposure to television.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of watching television far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of spending time watching television shows prove the significance of being entertained, but also pinpoint keeping up with the news implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-13 | Nawal Fatima | 11 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | kamyar.diba | 11 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | razaidi_110 | 85 | view |
- LAW Law can change human behavior Do you agree or not 55
- Law can change human behaviour Do you agree or not 55
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Law can change human behaviour Do you agree or not 55
- Some people believe laws change human behavior Do you agree with it 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'televisions'' or 'television's'?
Suggestion: televisions'; television's
...ividuals. I am inclined to believe that televisions role in todays world can be a plus, and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52430555556 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27659870213 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8318877295 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0194436428826 0.242375264174 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00651101780083 0.0925447433944 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0160196764114 0.071462118173 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0113497515379 0.151781067708 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129261832736 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.