some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers. why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this?
Many people arguing that the famous tourist spots are not well preserved or getting destroyed by the people who are visiting them. In this essay, I shall talk about some common problems in tourist destinations and I will give some solutions to tackle this matter.
Two of the extreme harms that are caused by tourism, known as vandalism and littering. Many irresponsible tourists are destroying ancient buildings while they are visiting them. For example, you can saw a plethora of pictures online from those who were claimed on an ancient piece to take a picture, and these led to lots of demolition on these areas. The other most common problem is the amount of garbages that are left behind by the sightseers at each location. People are not taking responsibility for the litter they are leaving behind while visiting the tourist locations, therefore the amount of garbages on these premises is getting out of control. Travelers may consume that one bottle or an empty bag of chips would not cause so much harm, but imagine if every tourist does this harmful action, what will happen to these spots.
There are some solutions to tackle these issues. First of all, governments and tourist agencies should take responsibility for knowledge enhancement of tourists about their actions and their consequences. In most cases, being aware of the negative effects that come from a small action could prevent the person to do it. Secondly, Governments and the authorities should put some firm rules and penalties for vandalism and littering. Heavy fines not only will reduce such actions, but they can use the income from fines for repairing and maintaining the areas. For example, Canada has a firm policy about those who litter in the tourist areas and fine those actions with $1000 tickets. This simple rule is one of the reasons for the enhancement of the situation in these areas.
In conclusion, Although there are detrimental effects with increasing tourism, with some education and rules, governments can limit the harmful actions and environmental pollution.
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge o 73
- Most of the people in society enjoy watching crime movies and criminal TV programs Why do you think people have more interest to watch them What is the impact on society due to this 67
- When people move to another country some of them decide to allow the customs of the new country Others prefer to keep their own customs Compare these two choices Which one do you prefer Why 73
- some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this 45
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08823529412 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62960915169 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538235294118 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6326853196 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22010492839 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657056265086 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566864697894 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13772110157 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568767040003 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.