some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this

Essay topics:

some people say that popular tourist destinations are receiving bad effects from travelers. why does this happen and what can be done to resolve this?

Many people are arguing that the famous tourist spots are not well preserved or getting destroyed by the people who are visiting there. In this essay I shall talk about some of the problems that are common in tourist destinations and I will give some solutions to tackle this matter.

Two of the extreme harms that are caused by tourism are vandalism and littering. Many irresponsible tourists are destroying ancient buildings while they are visiting them. For example you can saw so many pictures online from those who are claim on an ancient piece on an historical site to take a picture and this led to lots of demolition on this areas. The other most common problem is the amount of the garbages that are left behind by the sightseers on each location. People are not taking responsibility about the amount of the litter they are making while visiting the tourist locations, therefore the amount of the garbages on this premises are getting out of control. People may think one bottle or an empty bag of chips would not cause a lot of harm but imagine if every tourist do this harmful action what will happen to this spots.

There are some solutions to tackle these issues. First of all, the governments and tourist agencies should take responsibility to educate tourist about their actions and their consequences. In most of the cases, being aware of the negative effects that comes from a small action could prevent the person to do it. Secondly, Governments and the authorities should put some firm rules and penalties for vandalism and littering. Some heavy fines not only will reduces such actions but they can use the fines for repairing and maintaining the areas. For example, Canada has some firm policy about those who litter in the tourist areas and fine those actions with $1000 penalties. This reduced the amount of the garbages on this areas by a large number.

In conclusion, Although there are detrimental effects with increasing tourism but with some education and rules, governments can limit the harmful actions and environmental pollution.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-27 ehsanmajd 45 view
2021-08-27 ehsanmajd 73 view
2021-08-27 ehsanmajd 73 view
2021-08-26 ehsanmajd 73 view
Essays by user ehsanmajd :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...there. In this essay I shall talk about some of the problems that are common in tourist des...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... saw so many pictures online from those who are claim on an ancient piece on an histori...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e and this led to lots of demolition on this areas. The other most common problem is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...therefore the amount of the garbages on this premises are getting out of control. Pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 832, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...this harmful action what will happen to this spots. There are some solutions t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 458, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...ttering. Some heavy fines not only will reduces such actions but they can use the fines...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93696275072 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56619333487 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501432664756 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3716010688 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266721096885 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822841598607 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622159268391 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162395890151 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565749909634 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.