The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The two diagrams illustrate how a cinema has transformed over the course of 30 years.

Overall, there is a dramatic revolution of the cinema related to the facility equipment and accommodation between 1980 and now.

Looking at the illustrations, it is immediately obvious that there is a significant increase in the amount of the cinemas. One evidence is that there are  three cinemas built continuously which replaced the cinema 2, while it has been already transferred to the left corner of the cinema. Also, there is no longer the appearance of the car park in the area which has been expanded. Moving to the service area, it can be seen clearly that the drinks area is promoted into food and drinks one and transmitted next to the relax room, meanwhile, the DVD shop located near the ticket area.

However, there are still several remaining areas. As a witness, the ticket’s location experienced no change that it is displayed near the cinema entrance as it used to be. In addition, the outhouse which is between the two cinemas 1 and 2 stands at its previous area.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... cinemas. One evidence is that there are  three cinemas built continuously which r...
^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drinks'' or 'drink's'?
Suggestion: drinks'; drink's
...e area, it can be seen clearly that the drinks area is promoted into food and drinks o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and drinks one and transmitted next to the relax room, meanwhile, the DVD shop located n...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84864864865 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75617375923 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8652784753 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148843353282 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612208751924 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641583096958 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10141946738 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336050194514 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.