The line graphs represent a differentiation between local and foreign students who enrolled in courses in Australian universities from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from the graphs is that in terms of overseas students both lines followed a similar trend increasing. On the other hand, the number of local students rose up to a certain time then remained the same.
To begin with the total number, in 2001, 400000 regional students were admitted in the universities, while the number of international pupils was far less than local which was 20000. Then up to 2007, both lines had similar characteristics, whereas after that period the number of neighborhood scholars remained at 600000 till the end. On the contrary, the value of foreign students was continuously increasing and in 2010 the figure went to over 80000.
Turning to the commencing students, over the years the figure of local students fluctuates, while in 2002, the value was the peak which was approximately 230000. Then it decreased gradually until 2006 which closed to 190000, after that, it rose but not much above its peak value. From the beginning till the end the value rose incessantly but slowly to 40000.
- The government should control the Internet to reduce cyber crime and ensure safety of users To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The environmental problems that today s world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the envi 78
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, whereas, while, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09644670051 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78581714032 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6718997145 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18030489362 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768070808526 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573524110204 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1245399946 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467212260677 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.