The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Among the two line graphs, the first one illustrates the portion of electrical gadgets that people have their own and the second describes the time utilized by those devices to do household work from the year 1920 to 2019.
Overall, what stands out from the first graph is that from the early of the period there was a rapid increase of ownership of refrigerator and vacuum cleaner, while a gradual up and down was seen in the case of washing machines. As time went on, the utilization time climbed down exponentially.
To begin with the first picture, in 1920 the percentage of refrigerators as their own property was almost zero, whereas 30 and 40 percent people had their own washing machine and vacuum cleaner. After 20 years the amount of refrigerators went up from 0 to 55%, on the other hand, only 20 percent increase for both former and latter devices. In 1960 the percentage of refrigerators had crossed the other two devices but both were at the same amount which was 70%. Then after 1980 and 2000, all people had their own refrigerator and vacuum cleaner respectively. In 2019 almost 75 percent of people had a washing machine.
In 1920 people used 50 hours per week of these machines to do their daily work, while in the next 40 years the usage time decreased in the same ratio which was approximately 15 hours. After that, it gradually decreased and stayed at 10 hours.
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 73
- Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games However some people think that these activities are not good for a child s mental health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 73
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, then, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74590163934 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57277834067 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545081967213 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6694589266 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0946226560747 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406188803864 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435920063789 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714221112523 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480046948813 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.