The table and chart give information on in 3 years. Summarize information, report main feature and compare relevant information.
The table and bar charts provide information about nurses in one country for the following years - 1996, 2006 and 2016 based on numbers, gender and age.
Over the years, the number of nurses in one country increased from 1996 to 2016. The gender bar chart depicts that the female nurses dominated in numbers compared to males in all the three years. The age bar graph shows a comparison of nurses numbers categorized as nurses ‘under 30’ and ‘over 30 years’ of age.
Furthermore, it can also be noted that the gender gap between males to females decreased. While the percentage of males grew from 25% to nearly 40% in 20 years, the female numbers decrease from staggering 75% in 1996 to 60% by 2016. In 1996 the male to female ratio was 25:75 which changed in 2016 to 40:60 with the increase in male nurses. The age graph reveals that the nurses under 30 years were the highest, nearly 30% more in 1996. This changed in 2006 with ‘over 30’ age group nurses increased by nearly 20%. However, this gap reduced and was nearly at 50:50 ratio by 2016.
- Some people say that the only way to learn a second language well is to live in a country where that language is spoken What is your opinion about this 73
- The diagram below show the development of a town called Raytown between 1700 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below compares the responses of undergraduates and postgraduates to a questionnaire on their opinion about their university library Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- Some believe that technology such as mobile phones cell phones are destroying social interaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61904761905 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20852666448 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8776859123 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0725417099664 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329302113375 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608038429382 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860066211959 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844241692018 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.