: It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is appreciated that elementary students should learn to grow vegetables and raise animals. While this trend has both positive and negative sides, my verdict is that the obstacles outweigh the minimal benefits.
On the one hand, grasping the knowledge of cultivating vegetables and keeping animals would be minimally advantageous to primary children in terms of developing good characteristics and learning to put academic theories into practice. Initially, as growing veggies and raising animals are practical skills that may take up a considerable amount of time and dedication, some young children would accumulate a sense of responsibility and patience. Besides, these activities can help young members of society attain the capability of applying theories to practical situations. This is derived from the fact some kinds of gardening and farming requires a wide range of knowledge from the school curriculum. For example, without measuring, which is an essential mathematical concept, schoolchildren may not be able to complete their tasks in certain circumstances, such as estimating the needed distance between two rows of lettuce or the height of the cows.
On the other hand, for the reasons of time consumption and health concerns, I believe that learning these skills can bring tangible adverse effects, which outweigh the merits. To begin with, the process of gardening and keeping animals would be time-consuming; thus, it cannot fit in young students’s busy schedules. Besides, from a medical perspective, flora and fauna contain an excessive load of detrimental microorganisms, so if elementary schoolchildren receive prolonged exposure to them, they may be more prone to infectious diseases. Take rabies, a fatal zoonosis disease caused by a virus spread by an infected animal biting another animal or person, for example. It is uncurable once children get infected.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, although plants growth and animal husbandry programs have both advantages and disadvantages, I believe that it should not be taught to primary schoolchildren due to its overwheming drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-25 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | yufdtrdfyt | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | quytnee | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows changes in exporting goods in a country in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people think that technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think the opposite Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, so, thus, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60802469136 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22353900298 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626543209877 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6030983977 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.769230769 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229324928622 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758012499652 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762246861562 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137126019953 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227730291577 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.