In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the fact that in agriculture some advancement and breakthrough have been launched and implemented, the world still witnesses plenty of human beings in poverty or under malnourished condition. This essay will emphasise some reasons behind this contradict event and also suggest several solutions which my modify the reality.
To begin with, this serious problem has existed for some reasons in line with financial issues and other noticeable forces. In fact, those types of development have been invented and invested in order to stimulate the agriculture in developed countries while many developing countries whose major economy is agriculture cannot afford most of modern technologies. They still use mainly outdated methods in farming, resulting in poor crops with bring them a modest amount of produce or income which they have to manage to live on. Additionally, many regions must face other issues such as war and conflicts, climate change or poor natural resources preventing them from improving, making income or escaping from hunger. For example, a considerable number of nations in Africa have suffered from malnourished conditions because of their unpleasant weather which appears to bar them from doing farming properly or having productive crops.
As a result, it is essential to alleviate the problem with possible solutions. In order to support poor people, it is believed that wealthy individuals or residents from industrial countries should join hand, raise fund, and allocate the budget and resources to places in need. Moreover, every individual should be educated about environment, or humanity, so that they can be aware of the importance of having a better planet. In other words, when humans live in positivity and security, they can focus on working and making money; thus, they can possess advances themselves in improving productivity in farming without waiting for donation or allotment from others.
In conclusion, it is significant to identify the causes of hunger despite the improvement of technology and industry in agriculture. Consequently, several resolutions would be introduced effectively to address the current situation.
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 80
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment 84
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- In many countries more and more young people are leaving school and unable to find jobs after graduation What problems do you think youth unemployment will cause to the individual and society Give reasons and make some suggestions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advancement seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much advancement', 'a good deal of advancement'.
Suggestion: much advancement; a good deal of advancement
Despite the fact that in agriculture many advancement and breakthrough have been launched and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53313253012 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.919075656 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629518072289 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4790613774 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163130206873 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530037682231 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476587827076 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984122527557 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647048034869 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.