The two provided pie charts elucidate the percentage of individual’s total purchasing in one country in Europe was spent on various merchandises and services during 1958 and during 2008.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that food was having the largest proportion of total spending of each people in 1958 whereas the first place of percentage’s total purchasing in 2008 belonged to housing. It is also noticeable that entertainment had the least percentage of individual’s total spending during 2008 while the lowest rate of percent’s purchasing of each people during 1958 was luxury goods.
In the year 1958, food was a commodity that people mostly purchasing at that time and the percentage of it contributed to 32%, whereas it was just contributing to 12% during 2008. The proportion of people’s spending on housing in 2008 was 32% (the same percentage as food’s expenditure in 1958), while the amount of it was about 22% during 1958. Luxury goods took second place on the chart in 2008 (17%), compared to the year 1958 when it had the least proportion of purchasing merchandise when it just had 7%.
The figure for entertainment was the lowest in 2008 with just 6%, whilst it was contributed to 13% of total spending during 1958. The proportion of total purchasing on clothing and travel in 1958 were contributing to 18% and 8% respectively and the percentage of expenditure on the same two services during 2008 were 16% and 17% accordingly.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 70
- Some people think that the best way to make road transport safer is to make vehicle drivers take a driving test every year To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Many countries are spending a huge amount of money on supporting their competitors to take part in some worldwide sports competition Others argue that it would be better if these countries can spend the money on children to take part in sports To what ext 89
- Technology is responsible for unemployment To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, look, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07723577236 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00336086447 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439024390244 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0684115809 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.125 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361921842344 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19608738087 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498329428123 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253453964442 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126637407064 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.