The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts illustrate the percentage of British students who were able to have other spoken languages, besides English, in a British university, in comparison between 2000 and 2010.
Generally, Spanish was the most common language that was spoken among students in a British university in both 2000 and 2010.
As can be seen, in 2000, besides English, most British university students were able to speak Spanish, at 30%. Throughout a decade, the figure of which increased by 5%, at 35% and it still dominated the chart. The proportion of students who were multilingual and able to speak another language other than English also climbed up by 5% from 10% to 15%, and 15% to 20% respectively.
By contrast, the rest of the figures decreased, except for the stability remained in the group of college students speaking German at 10%. The figure for one using English solely decreased in half, which witnessed only 10% after a decade. Lastly, there was a 5-percent-decline in the German-speaking students' percentage from 15% to 10% in 2010.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six area of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mai features make comparisions where relevant 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, lastly, so, still, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92215568862 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85040003848 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.553828023 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340119773345 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142659585375 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865577574843 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200888351586 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096315049205 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.