The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The two graphs illustrate the proportion of households that owned electrical appliances and how much time take each household to do housework over the period of nearly 100 years, starting from 1920.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of households using electrical appliances while the opposite was true for the amount of time that was spent on doing housework.
In the beginning, comparing with 0% in the ratio of vacuum cleaners consumption, that of refrigerators were higher by 30%. Both these figures increased significantly 100% in 2000 before remaining stable until the end of the period. Although standing at the highest position in the beginning, at 40%, the proportion of households owned washing machines witness gradual fluctuation before reaching around 70% at the end, which is lower than two other appliances.
Turning to the other graph, households spent a huge amount of time doing housework in 1920, at 50%. This figure declined remarkably to nearly 15% in 1980 and then keeping instant in the next 20 years before continuing fall minimal to 10% in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-27 | nguyenhuyendan1133 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-24 | Luis Pham | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | 60 | view |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view | |
| 2022-05-31 | vinh_hoang | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 88
- The three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1992 and 2001
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15730337079 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78009862507 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657303370787 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2228044333 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.142857143 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256105107555 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115180504367 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121318847653 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168909204634 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893309936128 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.