To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The job of the public officials is to serve people. In the modern democracy, public officials are considered as the servants of the people of a society. I strongly agree with the prompt, as to serve for public, one must have good motives, which would come from his or her ethical and moral grounds. A public official has to maintain high ethical and moral standards, in order to become an effective leader and perform own duties. I think in this way because of two reasons.
As mentioned earlier, public officials are the servant of the 'public'. This person is responsible for ensuring the well-being of all kinds of people of the society. To make the society a safe and sound place, a public official has to maintain impartiality throughout his serving period. Let's think about a mayor who has venality. This official may try to give a construction work to a company which is not compatible to do the work perfectly, but giving the mayor some money. If this is a bridge, the bridge may end up being risky to use within few years. So, this would interfere with the safety of its people. The person failing to give security to the people cannot be considered as an effective leader.
The other reason I agree with the prompt is, to be an effective leader, one must sustain own leadership. If a leader comes to the society, do some great works, become famous, and then do something that discontents the people of the society in a way that finishes his career, he cannot be an effective leader. If we remamber Aung San Su Chi, the Mayanmar leader who won nobel peace prize for her outstanding leadership to stand against the military rule. But later in a time, when she became the prime minister, she remained silent and somehow supported a mass killing of Rohingya People by Mayanmar Army, which caused displacement of 700,000 people to Bangladesh, the adjacent country to Arakan, where Rohingya people lived for hundrades of years. This lead to the fall of the popularity of Su Chi to the international and domestic progressive commuinities. Which ultimately caused her to loose the power to the military again in a few years. This shows us that if a once considered great leader looses the ethical ground in one instance, that might cause the end of her leadership as an effective leader.
But some might argue that there comes some instances where a great leader has to compromise to obtain a good thing. But we have to remamber, the leader is doing this in order to ensure a 'greater good'. This is also also coming from an high ethical ground to make peoples lives better, which is the job of a great leader.
By ensuring the well-being of people and sustaining the leadership with choosing the right path on almost every instance, one may become an effective leader. With considering these, we can say that an effective leader would always maintain a high moral and ethical ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-10 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | ajay@123 | 62 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | idris oriyomi | 54 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same curriculum before college 50
- Altruism is a type of behaviour 3
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- It is more important to keep your old friends 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rtiality throughout his serving period. Lets think about a mayor who has venality. T...
^^^^
Line 5, column 859, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and domestic progressive commuinities. Which ultimately caused her to loose the powe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 890, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...inities. Which ultimately caused her to loose the power to the military again in a fe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: also
...order to ensure a greater good. This is also also coming from an high ethical ground to m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ter good. This is also also coming from an high ethical ground to make peoples liv...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, well, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 506.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72134387352 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5861773648 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3461751206 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.56 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.24 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272818326316 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825448190203 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619080353903 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174281373003 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052291424744 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.