It is better for college students to live far away from home than living at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
In today's world, it is a highly debatable issue that many people consider university students can gain more benefits from living far away from home than staying with their parents at home. From my perspective, I agree that settling far away from home is valid in some cases. However, I would suppose that the merits of living away from the care of parents are still remarkable.
On the one hand, there are a variety of benefits when young people choose to stay near their university or college. First of all, students can give hundreds of opportunities to integrate with others from different backgrounds and cultures due to geographical proximity. They can join in many extracurricular activities with their friends or share a few stories with each other. Therefore, they may boost harmonious relations with their mates. Furthermore, students are inclined to become more independent and mature. It is true that numerous children are spoilt by their parents, who often treat them like toddlers when they grow up. Thus, being away from parents enables children to learn how to deal with problems in their life. To illustrate, according to TIME, which is one of the most prestigious magazines in the world, independence is a significant factor required for students to succeed and adapt to the competitive world in the future. As a consequence, students may enhance their social skills and hone a set of techniques to survive independently in this harsh world, like managing money, cooking their own meals, and setting up their schedules. Additionally, college students can access several kinds of study facilities, such as libraries, laboratories, and computer rooms, if they stay near the main campus. These locations are conducive to their study progress as well as increasing students' freedom and advancing their self-study abilities.
On the other hand, there are a few drawbacks that have arisen from staying far away from home. First and foremost, it can be seen that living at home brings comfort and convenience for young people. At home, for example, there are high-tech appliances such as vacuum cleaners and washing machines, and children can rely on their parents for help with all chores. By contrast, in the dormitory, they are supposed to do their cooking, wash their laundry, and so on. These methods may create an imbalance between time for studying and relaxing, leading to depression and exhaustion in them. Furthermore, a well-balanced and nutritious diet is available at home, which is extremely vital in boosting young people's fitness. On the contrary, in numerous universities, students complain about the poor quality of food in canteens. Thus, they can feel starved and may cause a few diseases like sickness and dizziness. As a result, their academic performance and social life will be adversely affected.
In summary, there are both benefits and drawbacks of both approaches. Nevertheless, I determined that staying at home with family is a preferred option for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-22 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | letcallmemit | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods wheat maize rice by people in four different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Social people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The picture below shows Bell Hill farm in 1976 and the changes that took place in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...relations with their mates. Furthermore, students are inclined to become more ind...
^^
Line 3, column 1159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n meals, and setting up their schedules. Additionally, college students can acces...
^^
Line 3, column 1402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ir study progress as well as increasing students freedom and advancing their self-study ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 824, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the poor quality of food in canteens. Thus, they can feel starved and may caus...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in some cases, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 41.998997996 179% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2533.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24430641822 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95751037515 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 176.041082164 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6365554274 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.136363636 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9545454545 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422348583368 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118746387326 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991550182142 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275794855461 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133430682235 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.