The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The chart illustrates the information of transportation modes English people used to travel in 1985 and 2000.
For an overall perspective, it is evident that car is the most prefered mode in both 1985 and 2000, whereas a reserve patterns could be observedd in the figures of taxi.
According to the given table date, the main mode of travel among British people were walking,car,train, taxi and bus. Initially in 1985, the total travelled distance was more than 4000 miles. Among them, car was the most popular transport due to the amount of miles English travelled. In adition, over 200 miles travelled per person was the recorded number of walking and train. The local bus took the second place in the travelled mode of 1985 with 429 miles per person, In contrast, long distacne bus weren’t usually used by the English people while only have the same number of miles travelled with bicycle, with just only over 50 miles. Compared to the other transport with 450 miles, the taxi were not highly recommend by British people in 1985.
After 15 years, the total figures was increase by more than 6000 while the car keep its upward trend to have an average of travelled miles about nearly 5000. The amount miles of walking, bicycle and local bus were decrease while the total distance passed using long distance bus , train and other mode of transport incease in the year 2000
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of the silkworn and the stages in the production of silk cloth 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
- silkworm life cycle 73
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professionals Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ered mode in both 1985 and 2000, whereas a reserve patterns could be observedd in...
^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ording to the given table date, the main mode of travel among British people wer...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain mode of travel among British people were walking,car,train, taxi and bus. I...
^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , car
...ravel among British people were walking,car,train, taxi and bus. Initially in 1985...
^^^^
Line 4, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... distance passed using long distance bus , train and other mode of transport incea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81434599156 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42560736219 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540084388186 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0817899112 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14492633805 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699394392291 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616683403071 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115440771706 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688319359934 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.