The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The pie charts illustrates the three different kinds of nutrients such as Salt, Fatty Acid, and Added Sugar, which is consumed in a particular foods; Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and Snacks. If consumed abundant in quantity it can be injurious to the healthy lifestyle of individuals.
Overall, Intake of Salt and Fatty Acid is more in Dinner and Lunch. Whereas, least amount is consumed in Breakfast and Snacks. In the third chart, consumption of sugar is more in snacks as compared to other meals.
In first Chart, Salt is consumed more in Dinner and Lunch comprised of 43% and 29% respectively. Whereas, less use of this nutrient were in Breakfast and Snacks overall it was 28%; for each of them 14% respectively. In Second Chart, consumption of fats was more than 1/3 (37%) in Dinner. Likewise, for Breakfast intake was around 1/6 (16%). For both lunch and snacks absorption of Salt was around 47%, each containing 26% and 21% respectively.
In Third Chart, snacks contains more amount of sugar as compared to other three meals it was 42%. Whereas, same amount of sugar uptake if for breakfast as compared to fats 16%. Finally, less than 1/5 of intake is found in lunch.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- The chart below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 74
- The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002 82
- The chart below gives information about the household percentage of spending on essential goods in China for the years 1995 and 2011 75
- The diagram below gives information about the number of parcels delivered by two major mail services companies from 1920 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'food'?
Suggestion: food
...ugar, which is consumed in a particular foods; Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and Snacks. I...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s; Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner and Snacks. If consumed abundant in quantity it can be...
^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...cid is more in Dinner and Lunch. Whereas, least amount is consumed in Breakfast and Sna...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to fats 16%. Finally, less than 1/5 of intake is found in lunch. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, likewise, second, so, third, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96019900498 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6214043183 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4306179965 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6923076923 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4615384615 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083354342127 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321988501452 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388237749831 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611631807104 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359624516933 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.