In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
We are living in the twenty- first century which is an era of developed technology and cars are not an exception. We can’t deny cars’ contribution to our convenient life. With cars, distance means nothing. We can travel everywhere more easily and safely. However, a big improvement in public transportation as well as environmental problems are taken in consideration by everyone when it comes to the issue whether it is good to owning a car or not. In my opinion, I agree that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today because of a greater awareness of cars’ bad effect on the environment.
First, gasoline is used to function cars. With speed of using cars today, fuel sources may be exhausted soon. Due to the potential energy crisis, people are finding out alternative energy sources. But it is hard to make it efficient and economic because of limited technology. Moreover, cars emissions are blamed for air pollution and global warming. To solve these problems, we need to reduce the quantity of cars in our country.
Second, when the natural sources are consumed at a fast rate, the prices for using gases are going up. People will find ways to depreciate their daily expenses such as commuting by public transportation instead. Therefore, decreasing the number of cars will definitely happen in the future.
Third, since the public transportation has improved, it is convenient to take a bus or a subways. In some big cities, due to crowd, we always have to face the situation in which hardly finding place for parking cars or getting stuck in rush hours. So people prefer to travel by public transportation than driving cars. It seems clear that public transportation are much more convenient in term of being economic, fast, connected routes and friendly environment.
To sum up, although cars have served as a comfortable and safe vehicles in our life, overusing cars is damaging the environment and running out the natural resources. In light of these bad effects, I believe that in the next twenty years, there will be fewer cars hitting on the road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 80
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 50
- The populations of many fish species are rapidly disappearing due to overfishing and pollution There are many ways to address this issue and one of the most popular is aquaculture also known as fish farming Raising fish in a controlled environment has man 68
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'own'?
Suggestion: own
...omes to the issue whether it is good to owning a car or not. In my opinion, I agree th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a subway' or simply 'subways'?
Suggestion: a subway; subways
...oved, it is convenient to take a bus or a subways. In some big cities, due to crowd, we a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92415730337 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80939744218 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1148337453 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4761904762 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9523809524 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380076513066 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956222156946 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137207287079 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194778832612 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0990903101975 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.