The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The issue that the real talent of a popular musician cannot be assessed accurately until the musician has been dead for several generations is quite true. People who are very famous because of their fame could try to manipulate people into thinking that they are extravagantly great. But in reality, they have not reached that level of superiority in their field.
Musicians might create 2-3 good symphonies, but after that, it is not the case that all of their music is that soothing as before. But people still go to the music shows with a belief that they would get to listen to a new music which is pleasing. It happens most of the time, that the musician's new music is not that great and people would just clap for the musician because of his previous achievements. Meanwhile, the evaluators of the musicians would find that they are lacking the ability to evaluate the music and the crowd's acme support to the musician is more correct then their evaluation.
One of the example is, Virat Kohli, captain of Indian cricket team was in his heyday in the years 2016-2019. After that, his performance has degraded, but his fame remained as it is. So, now even if he performs very poorly, people would always praise him. Moreover, the match might be won because of the efforts of other people, but he gets the most of the credit.
Coming to the point that the talent of musician can be accurately accessed after his death is condor because there is no fame hindering the evaluators from evaluating the work with disinterest. The judges would try to get the purest form of assessment if they are not listening to the sounds of public that the musician is perfect. Although, another alternative of assessing the music is to not to tell the testers that whose music they are testing. By anonymising the tunes, they can avoid prejudices and find the true nature of the music.
Some may argue that even after musician's death, the people would remember his fame and still his works would be wrongly evaluated. But the issue that's why suggest to assess the music after several generations of the death of musician.
In conclusion, the issue is legitimate and would help in the field of musicians in understanding age old music and their flaws and the rectifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- In 20 years there will be less pollution in the air than there is today 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 80
- Among the intriguing mysteries that the dinosaurs have left for us one of the most persistent is what the arms of Tyrannosaurus Rex T rex were used for A recent presentation to the American Geological Society presented evidence to support the idea that th 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ould get to listen to a new music which is pleasing. It happens most of the time, that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crowds'' or 'crowd's'?
Suggestion: crowds'; crowd's
...e ability to evaluate the music and the crowds acme support to the musician is more co...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...support to the musician is more correct then their evaluation. One of the example...
^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of public that the musician is perfect. Although, another alternative of assessing the m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...e true nature of the music. Some may argue that even after musicians death, the pe...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...uld be wrongly evaluated. But the issue thats why suggest to assess the music after s...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest assessing'.
Suggestion: suggest assessing
...ngly evaluated. But the issue thats why suggest to assess the music after several generations of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75949367089 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52356939663 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486075949367 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8469758859 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9444444444 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318203572812 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106392710582 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140701746646 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171960492892 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101315780733 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.