The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares information about how many visitors came British by airplane at three main airports from 1998 to 2003.
It is clear that there was considerable upward trend in the number of visitors of both Gatwisk airport and Stansted airport while Heathrow experienced a slight decrease over the period.
In 1998, Heathrow airport stood at 27.2 million, then there was a significant increase in the number of visitors until reaching a peak in the next two years, at 48.2 million. Similarly, Gatwisk airport and Stansted airport also witnessed a remarkable increase at that time with 44.4 million and 39.9 million, respectively.
In 2001, the figure for Heathrow airport went down considerably at which point it levelled off at 33.2 million before increasing considerably again in 2003, with 45.6 million. In contrast, the number of visitors came Gratwisk airport went up steadily in the two following years, with 69.3 million, whereas Stansted airport remained stable in the last three years, at 43.3 million.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays more and more people use online shopping Some people think it is a good development To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The use of corporal punishment physically hitting students in schools is in decline yet it should be used to improve behavior To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from y 56
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that a negative or positive development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25766871166 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65952158558 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.8307452168 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.833333333 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.23603664747 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142430468343 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924673172734 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719615290211 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116808476866 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771387932102 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.