The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below.
The diagram illustrates the progress involved in the production of canned fruits from pears.
Overall, it can be seen that there are undergoing to several steps, with the start of collecting pears and are ending with the finished products.
Starting with the ripe pears, they will be picked by farmers’ hands, then transported to the factory where it washed to the elimination of dirt. After that, it will be checked the quality by a magnifying glass and is stored under cold temperatures with the good ones. Moving into the next step, the pears put into the scale are which be weighted and graded into different ones. Following this, pears are peeled in proceeding to slice them and the core are removed after.
In the other steps, the pears are packed into the cans and is sealed by the metal lid. In the next step, cans will be cooked at a specialized temperature, and are also sterilized fulfilment with pears. Towards the final steps, the cans with labelled, then are stored in the warehouse. And finally, the trucks are dispatched to the market where is selling to customers.
- The maps give information about a university sports court 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 84
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 78
- The graphs below show the number of hours Canadians spend on watching TV from 1990 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8128342246 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5141425593 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0974024514 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102475558403 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479287892248 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545853431995 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884327305932 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615163547529 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.