It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that more important? Do you agree or disagree?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that, due to some circumstances human beings as well as animals are suffering on this globe. Where, some people said that regime of nation should spend more money on taxpayers rather than animals. And, I agree with their perception but we should not forget wildlife. The rationale behind this viewpoint will be explicated in this essay, along with certain examples.
The most potential reason to be considered is poverty. Nowadays due to the lack of money, many people are suffering from starvation,education,homeless and etcetera. This is apparent from a recent article of well reputed newspaper which depicted that, as per the survey of 2020, in India more than 60% of people were beyond the poverty line owing to the pandemic. Though, some were died too.
Another cardinal point to be considered as poor health. In this global village, certain folks are suffering from poor health and the reason behind this is only poor economy. For instance, country like Malawi has the highest rate of people have poor health in the world only because of lack of medical facilities. Thus, this argument aptly proves that, governments of all countries should spend too much money on the human beings because they are dire in need rather than animals.
On the other side, fuanas are also a part of ecosystem, their problems should be not be neglected by government. Thesedays, due to urbanisation, animals are losing their natural habitat and it can be caused many health problems. Therefore, government should make sanctuaries, provide proper food and better treatment but it does not mean government should spend too much money on them. However, human life require more money to solve their problems as compare to wildlife.
In conclusion, after pondering over a great deal of thoughts, it can be said that, human beings as well as animals are part of ecosystem and both are equally important on this earth. Governments should give first priority to human beings not wildlife because citizens are suffering from severe problems such as povert, starvation and many more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | Anas Shaikh | 56 | view |
- It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that more important Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours.Summarize the information. 61
- It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 56
- Air travel is cheap thesedays allowing ordinary people to travel further Some peiple say that airfares should be increased because this leads to encironmental problems Discuss both views and suggest your opinion 84
- In some countries fast food restaurants and supermarkets give money to schools to promote their product. Do you think it’s a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as animals are suffering on this globe. Where, some people said that regime of nation...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with their perception but we should not forget wildlife. The rationale behind th...
^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , education
...any people are suffering from starvation,education,homeless and etcetera. This is apparent...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the poverty line owing to the pandemic. Though, some were died too. Another cardin...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould give first priority to human beings not wildlife because citizens are suffer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10951008646 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81341229191 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538904899135 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5241083871 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160996221439 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530191157795 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570519939589 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940095532703 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424299322464 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.