TOPIC: Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are different opinions about how people should face climate change. Whereas some individuals accept its impacts as a part of their lives, I completely disagree with this view because I believe that coexisting with climate change is not a long-term solution.
To begin with, it is true that there are some measures people could take to mitigate climate change such as using public transport to reduce fume emissions, however some consequences of climate change can lead to disastrous damages. To give an example, just a small rise in sea levels may cause floods or even tsunamis in many parts of the world, particularly in countries that do not prepare means to safeguard low-lying areas. Millions of people in those countries would become homeless and jobless, this puts a burden on the governments to support their people. In this way, the outbreaks of famine, homelessness and poverty are inevitable.
Furthermore, delaying to solve those environmental problems only worsens the situation. There is no doubt that climate change has threatened our life condition for many years, and finding methods of living with it is essential. However, if we only try to coexist with climate change, our environment will be always at risk, and get destroyed gradually. In this way, someday, our planet may become an inhabitable place. For example, climate change has desertified many areas of the world, that means people in those areas have to migrate to other cities or perhaps to other countries. It is likely that the longer the desertification may continue, the more habitable land on Earth would disappear. In other words, living with climate change is only a temporary solution, and it may even damage our environment in the long run.
In conclusion, it is cleat that we need to address the problem of climate change, and solving it completely is the only way to save our environment and improve our life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
2023-08-25 | Nhun Nhun | 84 | view |
2023-05-29 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
2022-12-15 | bnhanh02 | 87 | view |
2022-10-29 | Hangphan02 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
- Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer 67
- Some people think that the best way to ensure road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding bikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'delaying solving'.
Suggestion: delaying solving
...poverty are inevitable. Furthermore, delaying to solve those environmental problems only worse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74657293268 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566455696203 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5018409076 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256562493346 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808464721838 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598271621707 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153499585584 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253012771849 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'delaying solving'.
Suggestion: delaying solving
...poverty are inevitable. Furthermore, delaying to solve those environmental problems only worse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07594936709 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74657293268 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566455696203 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5018409076 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256562493346 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808464721838 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598271621707 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153499585584 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253012771849 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.