Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are various factors that drive a person’s shopping habit however a number of people opine that the most predominant force is age. From my own perspectives, age does significantly determine our proclivity in purchasing but its influences pale in comparison with social class and financial condition.
On the one hand, people who advocate the former notion can vindicate their point of view by indicating the fixed preference in shopping lists of different age brackets as a result of generation differences. Apparently, these days, modifications, especially in technology industry, has been taking place ubiquitously and continuously. People who were born in pre-digital era are more likely to buy books, holidays and non-digital items. Whereas the younger group are inclined to allocate their money in clothes, state-of-the-art technological devices and the like, which constitute fashionable. Moreover, age considerably impacts on taste in objects and consequently shopping habits. To illustrate, the youth are always seen in colorful, vibrant-colored clothing. In contrast, seniors tend to wear an ensemble of formal and darker tone of hue.
On the other hand, there is no shadow of a doubt that wealth determines what an individual can afford and therefore buy. It is money that either allows us to be generous with shopping bill or forces us to be frugal. This can be extended to a variety of products ranging from food, clothes to high-tech items, . . For instance, most individuals would love to buy the newest smartphone when it is released, drive in a luxury car and shop for expensive and healthy organic products at the supermarket. However, concerns about extravagant in shopping can culminate in shortages in other bills don’t allow less affluent class to cater to their demand.
In conclusion, despite the clear differences in taste present in individuals or different generations, financial flexibility is the clearest factor influencing a person’s shopping habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists and teachers are more successful Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 90
- Do you think business should hire employees who will spend the entire life working for the company Explain why you agree or disagree Use specific reason and details to support your answer 89
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The table gives information about department and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...g from food, clothes to high-tech items, . . For instance, most individuals would ...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rom food, clothes to high-tech items, . . For instance, most individuals would lo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in short, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49025974026 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19036824391 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652597402597 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1077716361 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.733333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113073263622 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338544304727 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314142006357 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629742714898 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245197416742 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.