In many countries, people now wear western-style dress such as suits and jeans rather than traditional clothing.
Why is this?
Is this a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, it is effortless to descry the pervasiveness of western-style clothes and plummeting preference over traditional counterpart. From my own perspectives, this is the direct consequence of massive globalization and advanced technology in fashion industry, and overall adverse development.
To start with, it is sufficiently apparent that globalization immensely facilitates worldwide propagating of western culture as American or European. Via proverbial prestigious fashion magazine, online platform or establishing branches, giant fashion co-operations have exposed their initially targeted consumers with numerous trendy and glorious clothing items. This, consequently, gradually modifies citizens’ shopping proclivity towards more Westernized style. Moreover, amid globalization, people living in distinct nations watch blockbuster Hollywood movie, listen to famous singers, and therefore emulate and purchase appurtenances pertinent to their lifestyle. This explain why brands choose household names to be their ambassador to upsurge sale figures. Additionally, automated technology allows colossal fabricating identical products follows significant decline in price and time. Decades ago, denizens had no other alternatives but ordering local tailor, whose procedures might take a few days. Drawing a parallel to current days, Zara or Louis Vuitton can offer, ship rigorously made and uniformed off-the-peg to their costumers at affordable price in a tiny matter of time. This privilege has considerably help foreign stores outweigh their domestic rivals.
Notwithstanding acknowledged advantages of western clothes, comfortableness, flexibility to name a few, those aforementioned merits can not counterbalance the loss of cultural diversity. To illustrate, in a plethora of parts of Vietnam, iconography in skillfully craft can emanate about the tradition of one particular ethnic passed down for generations. Furthermore, these beautifully clothing is not only one-of-a-kind artist product but also environmentally friendly.
In conclusion, Westernized vogue, which is result of globalization and technology development, has jeopardized the prospect of traditional clothes. I believe people should join hand by using and marketing them to save our precious heritage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | soodinzsh | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | soodinzsh | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | lehonganh1212 | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that individuals today are more dependent on each other Others believe people have become more independent 89
- Some people think that quality art can be made by anyone while others think that it requires talent and ability Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart illustrates the number of people in the UK eating more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1221, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...f time. This privilege has considerably help foreign stores outweigh their domestic ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.42394822006 5.12529762239 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46651645229 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.760517799353 0.561755894193 135% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2346705734 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0625 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158717939838 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477929647198 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443539955091 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899931576919 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349616287287 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.96 12.4159519038 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.89 8.58950901804 138% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.