Goverments in many countries have recently inteoduce taxes on food and beverages with high level of sugar. Some thinks these taxes are a good idea while others disagree. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Recently, goverments in many countries have passed law on taxes on food and beverages with high levels of sugar. Some people advocate their favourite with this legislation while other hold the opposite notion.
On the one hand, introducing taxes on sweet food inevitably contribute to a more healthy lifestyle among citizens as it considerably decrease sugary ration consumption. Reasonably enough, people are inclined to hesitate to spend extra money on ordinary products as candies or cupcakes. Besides, decades of researches have indicated that colossal amount of fructose digested can consiquently lead to many detrimental health diseases like obesity, diabetes type 2 or intefere with metabolism and escalte aging process. Morover, manufacturing food with high sugar percentage can exacerbate soil pollution.
Fundamental ingredients for producing sweetened substances come from plants which require gigantic cultivated surface and tons of chemicals to thrive at short notice, which is destructive to soil's well-being, before being delivered to factories. Soil after a harvest has lost most of its nutrients, unfortunately, continuous crops pile on the agony, leave no room for land to recover. From aforementioned points, it stands to reason that enecting taxes is beneficial to not only human being but environment as well.
On the other hand, skeptics have sounding reasons to bear witness to their opinion. Hunger is one of the most nerve-wracking issues affecting many countries in the entire world. That governments legislate taxes on food will aggravate the hot potatoes as less people can afford it.
From my own perspective, introducing duty on sugared food is a brilliant initiative as diminishing repurcessions. Furthermore, substituting for cane, farmers can switch to agricultures plants and authorities should lower prices of these commodities with a view to alleviating statvation and malnutrition.
In conclusion, goverments should enacting taxes on food and beverage with high level of sugar.
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 84
- People these days watch TV films and other programmes alone rather than with other people Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 95
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- An increasing number of children have become hooked on fat food and aerated drinks that do not provide much nutrition This poor diet has led to a rise in obesity among children What are the problems that are associated with obesity in children and what st 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 255, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...food will aggravate the hot potatoes as less people can afford it. From my own pe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leviating statvation and malnutrition. In conclusion, goverments should enactin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73509933775 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12763024698 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672185430464 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2301370361 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310543569363 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104427688382 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115638002117 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184732695134 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128094120119 0.056905535591 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.