Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent times, a large portion of newly developed medicines have been experimented on animals to identify both the efficacy and side effects. It is argued by many that these experiments should be held in retention due to their benefits to human being meanwhile, others advocate prohibition them as they are morally unacceptable. From my own perspective, I completely agree with the latter notion given the advent of synthetic laboratory tests.
On the one hand, it is agonizingly irrefutable that vivisection is beneficial to humanity as it provides crucial information about safety without adverse impact on human’s well-being. It is sufficiently apparent that via trial phase, products developer will be well-informed about body reaction particular drug prior to its release, therefore, chemist would be able to give precaution and make necessary alterations to minimize the unwarranted effect. For instances, medicine must undergo a variety of test phases in either small to massive scale to examine likely side effects.
On the other hand, conducting experiments on animals is inhumane and therefore should be eradicated. Needless to say, those things are against their right and inevitably have negative impact on their health. The outcomes can range from slight faint to even fatality, and thus is immoral to make a living body suffer from excruciating pain. It is estimated that 192 million, or thereabouts animals were used for scientific purpose globally in 2015 and millions of them had been killed. Furthermore, with the advance of technology, scientists are now capable of testing the effectiveness of medicines via computer simulation. For example, the cosmetic industry have substituted conventional testing methods for synthetic counterparts with the leading companies can be named: the body shop or cocoon. Therefore, it stands to reason that people should do away with animal testing.
In conclusion, notwithstanding acknowledged benefits of animal testing to humanity, I believe that we should enact regulations that ban atrocious activities towards other creature. Besides, scientists should also further apply artificial alternatives and costumers can join hand via supporting products with PETA’s animal test-free certification.
- Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees Some people think it is necessary but others are of opinion that is unfair Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- Some people argue holding sporting events is beneficial to a country s development Other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- The chart illustrates distances traveled per person per week in kilometers in terms of 5 types of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000 92
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Education should be accessible to people of all economic backgrounds All levels of education from primary school to tertiary education should be free To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6814159292 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09129624266 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648967551622 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7216576914 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.4 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292261573865 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891618531031 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080585309009 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167452042525 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584412903209 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.