Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress, but the quality at work.
To what extent you agree or disagree?
A number of people believe that managers should prioritize quality of work over physical appearance of their subordinates. From my own perspective, this notion should be vehemently advocated given that acknowledged merits have significantly outweighed its drawbacks.
To start with, skeptics would argue that putting on formal dress is an eloquent metaphor for profession. This is not only beneficial for the images of employees themselves but also of the entire cooperation. It is sufficiently obvious that our attitude towards a particular person or company is significantly impacted by first impression. If a new costumer interact with a neat-dressed workers, they would likely to establish more confidence in the company, which therefore increase the returning index. The apotheosis is bank industry, where faith takes precedence. Either executives or subordinates are obligatory to wear uniforms and not breach dress code regulation.
On the other hand, notwithstanding privileges of astringency in clothes, it pales into comparison with performance’s quality. Frankly saying, individual who dresses properly but contribute little to the development of the institutions is a hindrance to triumph. In contrast, an indiscriminate choice of clothing but efficacious work can now be the ultimate key to success. To illustrate, in recent years, big-tech company like google has liberated their workers from strict dressing rule in recognition of this. Substituting for suits, jeans, t-shirt, casual clothes or comfortable sneakers are increasingly more prevalent among workers. This is a powerful indicator for massive-scaled shift to placing more value on factors that are intrinsic to success.
In conclusion, the minor advantage of uniformed clothes for professionalism is overshadowed by emphasizing on quality’s counterparts. It stands to reason that, co-operations should enact further regulations to encourage more contribution to work.
- More and more people are relying on their private cars as a major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
- In today s world of advanced science and technology many still greatly value artists such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science cannot 73
- Many companies sponser sports as a way to advertise themselves Some people think this is a good for the world of spory while others think it is negative Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that individuals today are more dependent on each other Others believe people have become more independent 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91519434629 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42791517613 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696113074205 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.1047753608 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126275384494 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368535053231 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451059562386 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800150885826 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352312556936 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.76 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.