The diagram describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works. To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and, if necessary, make a comparison.
The diagram manifests the design of a home smokery and the procedure from raw material to the final products. From an overall perspective, the structure of local smokery is relatively simple and the process encompassed three stages.
Concerning the design, there are two main components, which are a large underground compartment with two lids on the same height as the ground. Above it is located a comparatively spacious box.
The first step starts with the fresh air drawn into the smokery via an opening lid. After that, the air travels through compartment to provide oxygen to start the fire. In this part, the second lid is lifted to add logs for the purpose of intensifying and generating greater amount of smoke and increasing the temperature.
In the final stages, the heat and smoke engendered previously enter a narrow tube that leads to the box. Thanks to the heat, food such as fish hung is cooked.
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did unemployed part time employed and full time when compared to men who had full time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 61
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 90
- The process diagram details the steps by which liquid chocolate is produced from cocoa beans 84
- The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94193548387 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70501903721 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664516129032 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3090529031 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0679291378506 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025910690117 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423519578454 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0376222887805 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549120924087 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.