The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected 3 regions of the world during the 1990s
Given are the pie chart revealing the main reasons leading to less productivity of agricultural land, and the table that focuses on the data in 3 main regions, namely: North America, Europe, and Oceania in the 1990s
Overall, it is immediately apparent that overgrazing and deforestation were the main causes of farmland in the whole world. Furthermore, the total of degraded land in Europe was the highest percentages during the 1990s.
As can be seen from the pie chart, it is clear that there were 4 primary causes to the agricultural land which overgrazing was the major one, with 35%, while the other reasons were just around 7%. During the same period, over-cultivation and deforestation were constituted around 28% and 30%, respectively.
Regarding the table, there was the land area degraded in Europe which have the highest proportion on average, accounted for 13%, and the main reason was deforestation, with 9,8%. By contrast, the total land area regraded by over-cultivation, which also the main cause leading to these problems, was reached to over 11%. Moreover, in Oceania, the percentage of degraded land was only 5% that over-cultivation was made up more than 3% of unproductive land
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Haphuong204 | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 51
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie chart revealing the main reason...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13775510204 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10097910805 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.7694667196 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.857142857 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257210695867 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118059366777 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884305941632 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175857908784 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811608340181 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.